major_bonar | Apr 12, 2014
They are similar but not the same: The tanned girl's bush in this picture is darker and hairier, and the lighter one doesn't have a beauty spot. Also, in "Lesbians 1", there is a dirt mark on the wall beside the curtain. My guess is that the photographer had a fetish for lesbian scenes between these types of girls, -same hairtsyle, skin tone,etc. You can clearly see that the faces are different. Thanks for commenting by the way.

vintage-porn | Apr 13, 2014
Sorry major bonar, you're way overthinking it - they're the same. What you're seeing as "dirt marks" etc are cosmetic imperfections on the print or page the images were originally scanned from, not actual marks in the scene. The differences in hair color and density are just become one image was scanned with a different contrast and gamma ratio. This image has a much higher contrast, and the other one had some marks/stains on the original hardcopy. I digitize antique photos for a living so I know what I'm talking about here. I have always thought these girls were beautiful tho, thanks for posting.