Share this picture
HTML
Forum
IM
Recommend this picture to your friends:
ImageFap usernames, separated by a comma:



Your name or username:
Your e-mail:
  • Enter Code:
  • Sending your request...

    T'nAflix network :
    ImageFap.com
    I Love DATA
    You are not signed in
    Home| Categories| Galleries| Videos| Random | Blogs| Members| Clubs| Forum| Upload | Live Sex




    Flaws in my favorite porn scene with Briana Banks #1

    As much as I love this scene with Briana Banks and Evan Stone which I think is near perfection for my personal tastes it does have some flaws that do annoy me.  So in no particular order here are some flaws.  Here is a link to the entire scene for anyone needing reference: https://www.tnaflix.com/hardcore-porn/Briana-Banks-2/video87300?

     

    #1  Why the Fuck is this bedpost blocking part of the shot?! 

    As you can see this bedpost blocks part of the view in the sequence starting here: http://www.imagefap.com/photo/1677652872/?pgid=&gid=5825952&page=2&idx=48  This is shortly after the actual fucking starts and it is the first shots we have of (most of) their bodies during it.  The worst thing about this is that it blocks part of her gorgeous body, imagine what a sight this would be to behold if we saw her entire backside.  

     

     The bed post is seen in other parts of the scene but only in passing as the camera always pans around until it is no longer in view, only here does the camera stand still with the post right there. The bed post appears to be positioned so that we can't see his penis going into her vagina. It is like the scene is trying to be less than a XXX rating in this brief sequence which makes no sense because the shot right before this is a close up of his penis going into her vagina and we see plenty of shots of the actual penetration later in the scene.  It is baffling! 

    The best explanation I can come up with is that it is meant to tease us and build us up for the better shots of her body during the fuck later.  Even if that was the goal it fails, it is just annoying and very inconsistent with how the scene is shot earlier and later.  We saw his entire penis in the deepthroat sequence and we saw basically all of her naked body pretty well exposed already and as I already pointed out we saw a close up of her pussy being fucked close up just seconds earlier in the last shot so then why the fuck would you want to obscure his penis and her pussy in a more distant shot of them?!   

     

    Another possible explanation is that maybe the director wanted that exact angle of her in that sequence and if they had positioned the camera at either end of the post where it would block nothing it wouldn't capture her right boob or just her overall right side naked profile he seemed to be going for.  If that is the case it would be an example of directoral incompentency to not remove the post for that shot.

     

      Just by looking at this one picture above I can explain how seeing everything would have been much better.  I would have loved to have seen her entire gorgeous naked body in profile here, seeing her entire arched back and ass, I would love to see what her other hand is doing and most of all just seeing her ride his towering dick high and knowing she is about bear down on him again like she is playing the big girl version of seesaw! 

    In a scene I love for amazing shots of her body from many different angles it is frustrating to not see part of her here for no good fucking reason.  There still is a fuck of a lot to love in this shot but it could have been even better!

     
      Posted on : Oct 19, 2017
     

     
    Add Comment




    Contact us - FAQ - ASACP - DMCA - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - 2257



    Served by site-7dcbc9b7d8-w9ddm
    Generated 02:44:59