This is my first attempt at a blog so, bare with me.

Over the years I’ve often contemplated how a viable Female ruled society might exist without some of the horrors that have been characteristic in those societies where men have ruled supreme and avoided just making women men in name only and vice-a-versa.

In this fantasy world, female scientists have developed chemical that changes hormones so that while men are still stronger than women in things like lifting and carrying when it comes to physical combat between the sexes men lose much of their strength while women gain strength so that a woman who weighs a mere 120 lbs. could defeat a man who weighs 200 lbs. In practical terms this would mean a woman the size of a let’s say a Lucy Lawless could defeat a man the size of a let’s say Steve Austen in a wrestling match. However, when it came to carrying a heavy suitcase it would be Austen that would end up with it.

Now, this chemical would be delivered in two forms: The first in hormones transmitted by women in their nursing milk that would cause women to start out more aggressive in their nature and men more passive and be continued in the second way in milk extracted in dairy farms where men would be transformed into human cows – their balls would become the holder of a good tasting crème that would be milked out of them in large quantities. This would mean that their balls would swell up to three or four times the size they were before the serum is administered but it would also increase the size of their dicks from 2 to 3 inches. Once changed, a male could never go back but then so what it would make them just more suitable for being sexually exploited by women.

Speaking of sex it would be very important that males be given more equality prior to becoming sexually mature because, why I have no dislike or disagreement with homosexuality, a female ruled society would need a large population of heterosexual men in order to use the desire to have sex with a woman as a way of controlling a man. Punishing young children violently is a good way to cause them permanent psychologically. So, it would seem to me that one of the ways a man marks his coming of age is learning to submit sexually to women. This is why it would be important for women to teach men that while sex is good and it’s good that they want it it’s only bad if a man is not controlled by a woman in some way in doing it. In practical terms a young male need only ask his mom or the woman in charge permission to masturbate and she would give him permission emphasizing that a person’s love of sex is a good thing. Now, if a boy masturbated without asking first (and this would not need to be daily ritual) then a woman might insist that for a period of time the male not be allowed any sex (a chastity device) or that he masturbate while she watches.

One thing the society would teach men is that they aren’t allowed to have the kind of privacy women are accorded as their natural right. So, for instance, removing a man’s clothing for public punishment would be considered perfectly normal but doing it to a woman would mean she had done something really bad. It would not be uncommon for young adult men to be used as models for girl students in their sex education classes whereas the boys classes would be confined to anatomical diagrams and the such. Of course, why both men and women would be nurses women would predominate as doctors and mothers and older sisters and wives would often be allowed to sit in on the examination of sexually mature males. Indeed, when it came to sports women would predominate as coaches and have full access to the locker room and shower area.

The whole idea then is that while society would strive to let men know that they should never be ashamed of their bodies they would be taught that through no fault of their own their bodies – especially their genitalia just made them inferior.