|
Deleted Photo's
|
|
Two of my better "daddy's little girl" captions were deleted by IF because the girls looked young... for the record, those photo's were chosen from a fellow-user's set, so I naturally assumed they were "legal"... any photo's I bring from other sites I have solid reason to believe are of "of age" girls, and since I try to follow the guidelines here, I like to think my fellow users do as well... The notifications did not say I was reported... "0 reports"... so I assume it was an over-zealous admin who used his or her own discretion... henceforth when I post "repost" material, I will label it so... hopefully that will prevent such misunderstanding in the future...
|
| |
| |
Posted on : Aug 14, 2013
|
| |
| |
Add Comment
|
|
|
Commented on Aug 14, 2013
W4sale, you might be right... but I do agree that the pictures looked young, when you're doing those type captions the younger look is what you want. Lot's of girls who are 18 or older look several years younger... just as girls who are 15 can pass for 18, it's a matter of how fast one physically matures. However I do try to know, or believe, that my subject material is 18 or older... hell, I have lot's off pictures at my disposal where the girls are only 17 or younger... some can easily pass for legal, but since I know they are not; I do not post them. If looks is all that matters, I'd never get one pulled... LOL
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 14, 2013
Hi, you could remember me as Endirect and we had some discussion you may recall. You say 0 reports but i still think it is the same user to user sabotage as with the intent underrating of pics. I have been removed at least 10 times so far - year, Yes 1 or 2 had too harsh captions but the rest was not so deviant.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|