Let's hope not anytime soon. Can you imagine a beautiful pic like the above becoming illegal?

Was it almost the case? I don't know. In Iceland you can buy Playboy and Penthouse, but you can't buy 'hard' porn. So I guess you can't buy magazines there with pics like these in it.

This is a damn shame! Because I don't see how a pic of two cute girls sucking cock harms anyone.

Why Iceland (and some folks in the EU) wants to ban porn from the internet is because of two simple reasons: women and children. 

When it comes to women, I refer to my previous blog about Hadley Freeman and the feminist movement reacting to female (semi-)nudity.

So what about children? Let me first state that I strongly believe Child-pornography is wrong. It's wrong to make it, it's also wrong to watch it.

Having said that, I don't think Lolicon-art is morally wrong. Why? Because it doesn't involve real children and because - usually - it's not about abuse. Mostly the toons in Lolicon-comics are about to discover sex in a pleasant way.

So, coming up next: my own discovery of female nudity and pornography.

 I think I was about 8 years old when I first got interested in nude women. I found them in the Snoeckx-yearbook. Snoecks is 'till this very day known for its nude-photography.

When I was 10 years old, a friend told me where babies came from. I couldn't believe it. Yet, at that age, I loved being nude and playing with my cock. You couldn't call it masturbation though. I just walked nude in my room while my hard penis was carrying one of my shoes by its shoelaces.

At the age of 12 I discovered hardcore porn in the videostore. Whenever I went, I always had to see pics like the above.

I waited six years before finally buying some porn.

I waited another year before I finally dared to enter a sexshop (and buy Seventeen-magazines). 

 Seventeen was truly a revelation towards me. Why? Because - take a look at the pic above - it featured girls who were around my age and - like me - enjoyed sex a lot.

So, I was nineteen when I first bought myself a Seventeen-magazine, but I was twelve when I first saw a Seventeen-videocover. So pics like the above where before my very eyes since I was twelve.

I was not allowed to see these pics. If you're younger than 18 years old you cannot 'place' pics like these. Excuse me, but that is BS!

 THE main reason why Iceland wants to ban porn, is because they want to 'protect' their children.

But what protection are they really offering? Boys who hit puberty, will want to cum. They WANT to see nude girls and sex (and I'm sure there are some girls as well).

We've already evolved our attitude towards puberal masturbation. It was considered a sin, now it's not anymore.

So what message do we give at our boys now? Imagine a dialogue between mother and son:

M:'You can yerk off all you want. While you're doing that, you'll probably fantasize about nude girls and sex. That's okay. It's normal. But you can't look at sex or nude girls on the internet while masturbating.'

S: 'Why not?'

M: 'Because it's immoral and it will disturb your ideas about women and sex?'

S: 'So, fantasizing about raping a girl would be less disturbing to you, then actually looking at girls who enjoy having sex and showing their bodies?' 

 I think - just as with regular media like films and videogames - porn should have age-restrictions. These restrictions should be based upon the amount of violence it shows. 

Very violent porn should only be accessible for adults (+18). Pics of nude women/men in a non sexual context, should be available for everyone (this is in most countries already the case b.t.w.).

I don't think it's an immoral message to tell teenagers it's fun to show your body because it get's you horny. Pics like the above should be legal to see from as soon as the age of 12. 

Pics that show that sex can be a lot of fun and involve multiple participants, should be legal from as soon as 16. Why? Because this kind of sex involves 'sluts'. I mean the two girls in the pic above have fun. In consider their behaviour as 'normal', not as 'extreme'. Imagine them sucking four cocks and getting peed on. This type of behaviour is 'extreme'. You must be able to make a difference between 'normal' and 'extreme' sexual behaviour. You should learn to respect both types of pornpeople. 

 All the pics I've inserted in this blog are 18+. Like there isn't a difference between this latest pic and all the other ones. 

An anal fistfuck-pornpic can easily be seen as a reason to ban porn. So you need to be educated, you need to understand. Many women will say to themselves: 'Oh, I would die of shame if a pic like that would circulate on the internet.'

But maybe this girl loves getting analy fistfucked. Maybe she's very proud on a pic like this. Because so many adults cannot see this pic right (it's not degrading for the girl, given its context), it's certainly not a good idea to show these 'extreme' pics to youngsters.

 If some porn is not only for adults but also for youngsters, there will be plenty more cute porn. Porn that simply cannot be seen as degrading towards women. Porn that celebrates nudity and sexuality. Porn that shouldn't be banned.