|
Interest= Young
|
|
Hello Fans!
This will be my first blog entry due to something that came up in a chat.
My most controversial interest is the Young tag.
That term is vague, and I just meant with the tag, that I desire people who are defined as "young" by the majority of people residing in society. Of Course I am interested in many people older, in fact some seniors look stunning these days. My desires are probably from 17-40.
In my country (Canada) 16 is legal (the current age of consent) the previous one I agree was too low at 14.
Now here is the controversial part: Is there that big a difference
between 16, 17 and 18?
I am not asking for anything outside of Image Fap guidelines of course, just your thoughts on where the true differences lie such as physical, experience level, or other.
|
| |
| |
Posted on : Apr 9, 2010
|
| |
| |
Add Comment
|
|
|
Commented on Apr 12, 2010
I think what people forget about some of the "young" pictures banded around the internet is that the kids in these pictures are abused and forced into these acts against their will. The pictures may look nice and pretty but many of these kids are forced against their will to do these things and will be scarred for live, those that live, the rest will not live to grow up to be able to report the people involved. It's a horrible truth.
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Apr 12, 2010
It is something governed by our societies and social excitability which is why the age of consent has varied over the centuries. I'm not sure it's measured in the bible or many other religions and there were no rule books. Personally I think it would be wrong for a 40 year old to have desires about a 14 year old. But at school a 16 year old could quite easily have a close relationship with a 14 year old and I think we forget just how grown up a 14 year old can be.
It's all a matter of point of view, the Minoans were around at about 700 BC and people would be very lucky to live past their 30's so a midlife crisis in those days would happen at the age of 15. They were expected to grow up quicker and have children as soon as they were capable and were lucky to see their children grow into their teens.
But now we live into our 80's and 90's and we give children the chance to live as children much longer although they will rebel and fight against this more often than not. A child will grow up when it is ready and I guess we have set rules up to protect those who are not yet ready. It unfortunately means that a 16 year old boyfriend can go to prison as a pedophile at for having sex with a girl one day older than him.
I can remember girls at school ready for sexual exploration at the age of 14, almost as soon as you move to big school at the age of 11 or 12 you start to fondle with guys bits and pieces. But somehow as adults we forget this.
The rules are there to protect the innocent from being exploited by sex fiends, but if you are a fiend then you are going to exploit whatever enters your twisted mind anyway. If you are a 17 year old that has fallen in love with someone aged 15 but are only one year and one month apart then you probably wont even be aware of the seriousness of the offense you may be about to make because there is no real difference between those two people.
Anyway I waffle. Maybe there is no answer. So long as there is no abuse then there can't be a crime surely.
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Apr 9, 2010
Age restrictions are nothing more then artificial taboos forced by society. As far as nude pics are concerned the only legit restriction (despite our absurd laws) is consent. With sex there is also the practical matter of puberty, but again consent is the only legit restriction. That society has put artificial restrictions on age into our laws is infuriating.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
