The internet is awash with porn and amateur photos these days.  The popularity and accessibility of sites like this, as well as XHamster or Wifelovers or any number of others, and with digital cameras and now camera phones....well, it's never been easier.

 I love showing Diane off, but we've been caught out by re-posters taking our images and sending them into sites as 'them'' and over which we have no control.  That's annoying.

But I also miss the absolute thrill of taking real, film-based photos in a semi-formal shoort, where the lighting, setting, clothing and sequence of shots is carefully planned.  It's massively erotic to think it through and then have Diane pose as though she were a model.

It's was even more of a turn on going into the photo shop or chemist and picking up the develped photographs and negatives, knowing that someone, somewhere had seen her spread and naked - perhaps the guy handing over the package (we used to use the same shop in Swindon, UK each time, and I hoped that they would recognise her as we went in to pick up the photos together).

And then you look through the photos together (some thrown away as blurred, or terrible lighting, or a funny face-pull),and choose which ones to send off to the readwers wives section of the soft porn mags.  Diance has been in UK's Escort, Fiesta and Razzle mags, and getting that letter to say she'll be published, and then buying the mag off the rack in the local newsagent was also such a turn on.  We used to fuck like crazy each time she was published (we used to fuck like crazy anyway).

So yes, I love the ease and snap-snap-snap advent of digital photos and sites like this.  But I do miss the absolute eroticism of ''old style'' plan-shoot-develop photography. 

Sometime sprogress is convenient but we lose something along the way