|
Maybe it's just me but...
|
...to me, "sexual" acts without possible breeding as a direct outcome don't really qualify as incest.
Like... [always with relatives, of course]... anal, oral, fondling, any kind of homosexual "sex", condom covered penis vaginal penetrations, unprotected vaginal penetrations with persons who still can't or no longer can impregnate or get pregnant... none of it qualifies as incest to me.
So it all could and probably should be happening more, without limitations.
|
| |
| |
Posted on : Dec 14, 2025
|
| |
| |
Add Comment
|
|
|
Commented on Dec 15, 2025
Yes. I don't know why this is such a taboo. It's just sex. Our bodies need it. If you are both adults who can protect themselves from having children, then what is the problem to just do it? Who cares if it's with a relative or not, when the outcome would be an orgasm and nothing else?
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Dec 14, 2025
mmm good thinking
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
