|
2. who do you think i am? btw.: do you think?
|
i think it's a pity that you am extremely reduced to very few options to describe yourself when creating your profile. nowadays it is way too primitive to explain a position like mine in those very reduced categories of male/female/straight/bisexual and even ts/tv and gay/lesbian reduced to one category each.
maybe i appear at normal daylight as a cis-male. ok. you will have me in drag/lingerie only for sexual interactions, so you could read me as a cis-male, but nothing could be further away from my self understanding. i don't find myself in those categories of gender and also those regarding sexual orientation of which you cab choose here: ok, bisexual points at the right direction, but my orientation is pan and theres quite a bit of difference between those two. translated to bdsm for example such a heavily reduced variety of classifications would turn out desastrous if people want to interact, let alone when searching for rl contact.
in my case the amount of space i have in my profile won't allow to describe me at least a bit. so i try to do it here, where i have space.
i already confessed to be pan, what doesn't mean for me in the first place that i want to fuck/want to be fucked by anything that moves. as a matter of fact: nothing is further from my mind than that. in my case it means rather that i CAN be sexual attracted by a person of whatever sexual orientation/gender IF i am attracted by certain circumstances that define the person. in my case that means in most of all cases: intelligence- i feel attracted by people that have a big brain and use it (here emphasis is on 'use it'). so you can call me sapiosexual. but in my case it must be intelligence in combination with social competence and a mindset of humanity and anti mainstream in this world of social injustice, greed, oppression and... you know the rest. intelligence is the most important part, but not all- it means you can have a high iq and still be a complete antisocial cunt (best example: a fascist)= zero attraction for me. the same with nice people that wouldn't hurt a fly but are stupid like a brick= no matter how attractive/beautifull/sexy= zero attraction, no erection. no chance for bimbos, not even for a no brainer quickie behind the landfill. i can tell you, that's not easy...
(soon to be continued)
|
|
|
Posted on : Nov 18, 2022
|
|
|
Add Comment
|
|
Commented on Nov 22, 2022
I agree with your point about the archaic definition system here. I mean it still uses terms like TV on main categories!! 🤷
But apart from that there are some really nice people here 😊
I like your sapiosexual mindset. Its can be a real turn off the amount of misogyny and racism that is in categories I love such as crossdressing. Just have fun and be nice its not that hard!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|