Homosexuality As Population Control

With the natural world on the brink of demise largely because of overpopulation, unrestrained homosexuality, as one of a variety of ethical and democratic measures available to us today, offers perhaps the most natural option to be enjoined. What other options are as attractive? We don’t want to die young. We don’t want to face illness or catastrophe. Many individuals and societies refuse abortion and birth control. Few would condone or submit willingly to the kind of international law imposing a one-child policy like that exercised by China on all nations. And we hardly need to be reminded of the history of racist, eugenicist, and militarist agendas for imposing growth control on unwilling and unknowing populations. So why shouldn’t homosexuality be seen as providing a viable option to overpopulation—to the point that the world’s nations come to encourage its practice and esteem its benefits? It is, after all, the most harmonious way to control the population—considering all that’s required is that we love and support our gay sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, parents, friends, lovers, and selves.