Add Comment
|
|
|
Commented on Aug 12, 2008
I dont think my avatar annoyed anyone in fact i got good responses from female users. Check my profile comments not one complaint :P
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 12, 2008
so i uploaded an ass-avatar now. Hope that noone is annoyed because of this.
What kind of page is this here? A Pornpage??? I think you are right: show pussies, not cocks!!!
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 12, 2008
Now when I know that my profile wasn't haxxed I got even more annoyed. The first question is: why not send a message to all of us that had a cock in our avatar?
Second: this is a lousy way to run a forum.
Why censor dicks, cocks, penises? What is wrong with cocks? Honestly, as some already stated, there are worse avatars, pictures and also “Clubs” in here than an erected dick. For crying out loud, do you think it will gain the forum?
Lots of “men” in here have avatars of some woman with big tits, ass hole, pussy, etc, or even (they are represented in this thread) an avatar with some young (under aged) girls with braces. That is pure incestuous stuff that should render in a perm ban! But, instead dicks are banned? What the hell is that?
There are clubs that are referring to “incest” and all kind of other crap which is a violation to any (99, 9%) law written on earth. Still those clubs are up. And now you want to ban avatars of dicks?
More over there are lots and lots of people in here that aren’t certified as men, or women. That would be a first step to take towards a decent forum, regardless its content. We are here to talk and chat about sex! Aren’t we?
I quote from your forum rules: “- Nudity, partial nudity, or posing as "models" of children of any age (this will always result in termination of account and a report to the authorities)”
Well, this sux big time and it is a LIE!
I never in my wildest dreams thought that a “hard on” cock was worse than http://imagefap.com/clubs/index.php?cid=216 “Teens Only!” or/and http://imagefap.com/clubs/index.php?cid=1113 “Dark Incest”
THAT is some real scary stuff to take care off!
Straighten up and get a grip, cuz your moralizing sermon is a load of bull s***.
Please, delete my account! I am out!
Regards,
St0n3h4rd
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 12, 2008
Moss posted "TO ANYONE WHOS ANGRY ABOUT ROOSTERS: please remeber that A FILTER IS DIFFERENT THAN A CENSORSHIP. censorship is when your are denied access completely, like in japanese porn. filtering is an OPTIONAL feature. all the galleries on imagefap employ filtering. thats why you get shemale porn, not blowjobs, when you search for shemale porn".
Never heard such UTTER nonsense in my life.
a) I hardly think that (quote) "most profiles contain nothing but erect penises as avatars". This assertation is quite simply.
and
b) Imagefap is FORCE filtering, which is exactly the same as censorship. As someone else has pointed out, the option to turn "off" would have been more acceptable to most than the option to turn "on".
There is a clear distinction between having the avatars blocked/changed by DEFAULT and having the CHOICE to block them.
There are far worse avatars on here than ones with cocks. Sort them out before spouting your Nazi drivel.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 12, 2008
Agree 100% with Ultrafetish.
There are much more "offensive" avatars on here than cocks.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 11, 2008
I have to say I'm glad to see the back of all those thrusting todgers. But it would have been less controversial to make it optional to turn them OFF and not ON. And as for the ads ..... what ads?!? I use FF with Adblock+ and haven't seen a single ad since I joined up again. (old account forgotten). lol.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 11, 2008
hmm I think I will close my Imagefap account. The site is getting more annd more boring
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 11, 2008
@ admins:
your "show cock avatars ticking box" feature doesn`t work !
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
" A growing number of users is 'annoyed' "
I'm more annoyed by the poor grammar.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
:-( Not goood
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
Although i did wonder If I had strayed onto a cookery site there.......
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
Cheers guys best laugh I've had in ages........all these sad guys who think it's cool to post their teeny tadgers as avatars have got some self esteem issues they need to deal with........and there's nothing like humour to make people look at themselves.....
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
My avatar isn't just of an "erect cock". Rather, it is of two cocks caressing each other, the most beautiful sight in the world. I chose it as a symbol of the beauty and intimacy of man to man love.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
imagefap works for the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
did i wear my yellow star?
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
you should more to filter weird bdsm,scat lovers,zoo lovers and all this crap because they disturb me more
ein zwei links rech links recht
fur mein furhrer
ein reich ein volk ein furher
adolf mein lieben
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
Discrimination! My cock is misrepresented by the picture of a bird (believe me, there isn't a single feather on it), and yet I still get bombarded by a bunch of old hairy cunts!
No, I'm not offended by all the old hairy cunts. If I don't like what I see, I don't look! Same for those faint hearted users, if they don't like to look, don't look! Why would someone even come to this site if they don't like what they see? But of course, in this world of political correctness, we all have to give in to those weaker souls even if they are a minority. As you can tell, I'm not very PC ... hell I don't even make a good calculator let alone a PC!
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
ya, anyone who has a tissue with this rooster stuff should head over to the forums and join in on the "civilized" discusison, kthxbye
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
This discussion is just fabulous, I love it. I counted roughly 1:7 supporting comments - where is this "growing number of users (being) annoyed..." ?? Watch the forum The Pit of Fire focussing at this subject.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 10, 2008
I think this MUST be a joke ...
I don´t know anyone who is "annoyed" by my fat cock !
Sorry guys, but this "feature" is no good idea !
Especially because of the fast growing number of advertisements on all these pages, please don´t censore the members` avatars or their galleries.
I think we´re not in China !
Thanks from Germany
Long live freedom
DL
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
An improvement, certainly
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
TO ANYONE WHO WAS WRONGLY ROOSTERED: my deepest apologies, it was definitely a mistake. i went through about 12000 avatars. it was inevitable that i would miss label a handful. reupload your old avatar and it will not be filtered.
TO ANYONE WHOS ANGRY ABOUT ROOSTERS: please remeber that A FILTER IS DIFFERENT THAN A CENSORSHIP. censorship is when your are denied access completely, like in japanese porn. filtering is an OPTIONAL feature. all the galleries on imagefap employ filtering. thats why you get shemale porn, not blowjobs, when you search for shemale porn.
just switch the filters off (as i have done) and imagefap is exactly the same as it has been...buggy and slow and full of porn.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
Censorship?? What made ImageFap so hugely successful was the freedom to post ... whatever. Also, you might want to take note of the advertising on the sides of your pages. Answer me this, how does this really differ from what people are using for avatars??
If you are going to censor peoples avatars, you better start filtering your advertisers as well. I wonder how much revenue you will get by showing roosters for advertisements?!
And if you want to "Filter" the male genitalia from avatars, your next step BETTER be to filter the female genitalia as well. A picture of a tuna, perhaps?
'Filtering' is just a not quite so UGLY word for CENSORSHIP. Keep ImageFap pure. That's what made it what it was.
Besides, if someone doesn't like a particular avatar that appears on their page, they always have the option to delete it, right? There is ALWAYS going to be certain pictures or avatars that will 'annoy' SOMEONE!
You also want to talk about seeming hypocritical, you're 'generic' avatars depict what one would be doing to the object that you are trying to "Filter"! As Carlos Mencia would say, "De-de-dee!"
Get real!! There are much more worthy crusades you could pursue.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
I am elated by the change. I've talked with many other teen members male and female who are revolted by the cocks, especially the gnarly old ones. This is a step in the right direction.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
Common courtesy would have DICKtated to announce this change before implementation. Furthermore, my avatar also included female body parts, which means
you changed, not only cock avatars, but all that included cock. While I have no problem understanding that this is your decision, I do not appreciate how you went about it. I am pulling all my galleries.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
I think that some of these new cocks are more impressive than some of the avatars. I recognized them from the Admin 'Cocks' gallery. I just hope I don't start seeing avatar replacements with 'kitty cats' where the ladies are on display.
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
Guys, you are really funny...
[Delete]
|
| |
|
|
Commented on Aug 9, 2008
How about filtering avatars containing combats, ugly male faces, american flags, skulls and bones instead of filtering those with cocks, hehe. This new feature is just comical.
[Delete]
|
| |
