longhairfish wrote:USA states - I don't know yet. Other countries may or may not require blocking.
Well... for the USA it still seems to be State Law. Not Federal Law. Let's take another example what that means: Reddit. A Platform located in the USA.
Rule 7 about content on that platform states
Keep it legal, and avoid posting illegal content or soliciting or facilitating illegal or prohibited transactions.
Ok so far. One of the mentionned illegal transactions is
Paid services involving physical sexual contact;
We all know the position of prostitution in the USA. Meanwhile Texas has enlarged the definition of prostitution on paid online services. Yes, that means OnllyFans and so on. But that's State Law. Not Federal Law.
So inmates of the USA: keep cool.
Ok. Back to our issue.
The kinds of illegal content and activity that platforms need to protect users from are set out in the Act, and this includes content relating to:
(...)
fraud
(...)
Let me guess: ebay.co.uk is dead now.

@longhairfish
As far as I see the issue is not only the registration data of the registered users.
You also have to prevent others from seeing the content as a visitor. So in my opinion the only option for any website provider is to cut all internet connections to the UK without any exception.
The island apes want to be alone in the www? Let's leave them their will. I will block British IP addresses from my servers too asap. Not even from my sites but also from my DNS servers.
And I encourage everybody offering DNS services to do the same.
SITE NOT FOUND - target address cannot be resolved.
That must become the new BWW (British Wide Web) aka British internet. In both directions.
Let's show them that everybody is responsible for his own decisions which content he wants to see and the personal educational mandate and responsibility of the parents which content their children can access.