My first flagged gallery.

[Silversleeves]

Or it is so far as I can remember.

Now it looks like this place is getting on with it. When a site finally gets round to applying its rules on one of its longest-time members, then it follows that anyone -- read that again, anyone -- who's joined since is fair game. And fairness is what we're all after, isn't it? Treat everyone the same, and no one has reasonable cause to complain.

Now do me the favor of deleting the gallery instead of holding it in limbo -- we just came back from an upload server "hiccup" and I shouldn't want anything I've posted rushing us towards the next one prematurely when the gallery can't even be accessed by its supposed "owner."

I simply wonder why I was able to make the same gallery that was flagged, private. And it is, too -- I reloaded my own profile page and it went from "there" to "not there." It happened to be one of the ones to which I was adding pictures: I had just re-ordered them when the Flag message replaced the usual lot of thumbnails in the big rectangle of the first thumbs page. Being able to change status on a gallery to which one has no other access smacks of something exploitable, from where I sit.

Ahh for the days not so long ago when I could look forward to the pink one refuting all my points with her pillow-soft and spot-on pique.

BZT

[moss]

wasn't me

[shikaka_1875]

Ahh for the days not so long ago when I could look forward to the pink one refuting all my points with her pillow-soft and spot-on pique.

BZT

What's happened to rougefemale I've not seen her in a long time, her profile indicates she hasn't logged in for almost 2 months