Page 1 of 1

Still "mouseholes" in the Private "wall"?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:04 am
by Silversleeves
Don't mistake this thread for a gripe or complaint. The first post (below) is just a random string of observations. 8-)

I just uploaded a gallery of four pics to test both the Uploader and the "won't appear on Public lists" claim the Uploader, even in this new guise, makes as a note explaining the "Private" checkbox. After a bit of go-around with setting which of my Organizer sections it would be in if it were public, I re-loaded the thumbs page to find that two of the four had already reached a count cycle of views (3).

So I gather there are still holes in the "wall" or "screen" between Private galleries and the "public" (ie, anyone surfing ImageFap). Anyone who's found their Privates peeked at like this lately -- within this calendar year of 2011 to start off -- is welcome to add to this thread.

BZT

Re: Still "mouseholes" in the Private "wall"?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:48 am
by ASTAROTH 5
You do realize that the views also count you......!

I had the same problem so I posted an image and visited it five times and it counted it........

Re: Still "mouseholes" in the Private "wall"?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:24 pm
by longhairfish
When someone posts a gallery that is private it can still be checked by the Admins and Moderators. When we see those galleries and will check them out if it seems like we have to. That will count as a 'hit' on the picture from us.

Re: Still "mouseholes" in the Private "wall"?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:23 pm
by ASTAROTH 5
I never actually thought of that.......

Re: Still "mouseholes" in the Private "wall"?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:17 pm
by Silversleeves
I should have thought of it. From time to time you'll find the phrase in my posts "the mods are also members." Stands to reason the gallery software thinks so, too. *G* And counts their views appropriately; the chiefs with the indians so to speak.

BZT