"Low-bowlers" are at it again.

Moderator: admin

"Low-bowlers" are at it again.

Postby Silversleeves on Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:46 am

What's a "low-bowler"?

Someone who goes through galleries and votes pics "1", regardless of how good the pic is or what's in it. Chances are they don't even look when they vote. Some might be doing it with scripts. Wouldn't be that hard, if you knew what you were about.

Even with one more higher vote of "9" or "10", the best rating one can expect in short order is 5.5.

Just an FYI. Not that it matters all that much in the scheme of things.

BZT
PS: Conspicuous by its absence (since the last big "features & functions fix-up"): Getting arbitrarily logged-out when uploading. Am I the only one who noticed, or is it that I'm the only one who's been so lucky (knock on pressboard) ?
"He has all of Nelson's qualities, except one. He has not learned to disobey."
- Admiral Sir J.A. Fisher, RN, 1914, referring to Admiral Jellicoe
User avatar
Silversleeves
 
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 9:25 am
Location: Somewhere you're not.

Re: "Low-bowlers" are at it again.

Postby Brownfinger on Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:35 pm

This is annoying , it disables one tool to sort out boring crap from nice porno pic's it could be helped with limit the low rate max 10 per 24 hours or so.
The rating is there to help . Sometimes amateur pic's get bad rating just because someone don't like amateur type pic's !? Don't look at them then !
User avatar
Brownfinger
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:47 pm

Re: "Low-bowlers" are at it again.

Postby Irregular.Fox on Fri Feb 04, 2011 1:36 am

What effect does rating a picture down have?
User avatar
Irregular.Fox
Site Admin
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:37 am

Re: "Low-bowlers" are at it again.

Postby Silversleeves on Sun Feb 06, 2011 2:34 am

Irregular.Fox wrote:What effect does rating a picture down have?


Not much, overall, except it does tend to drop the cumulative "score" of a gallery down with it. Over on rougefemale's SUGGESTIONS thread, I went into this in more detail.

Since there are so many members on ImageFAP, and it's been around as long as it has, different folks have taken to picking galleries to browse on the Big List based on such things as its/their cumulative "stars" score. If you or I as uploaders are keen that all our galleries get a fair shot at being looked at, it can't help to have one at 7 stars and the other at 2, if this is the yardstick (an unknown but I presume large enough number of) people use to surf galleries.

BZT
"He has all of Nelson's qualities, except one. He has not learned to disobey."
- Admiral Sir J.A. Fisher, RN, 1914, referring to Admiral Jellicoe
User avatar
Silversleeves
 
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 9:25 am
Location: Somewhere you're not.

Re: "Low-bowlers" are at it again.

Postby Irregular.Fox on Sun Feb 06, 2011 2:51 pm

I just went through my galleries, and most of them have scored pretty high. Huh.

But it still doesn't matter to me that much. It's not like I'll ever be earning enough from gallery views to get any money out of it.

I've never cared about the rating of the gallery when I open it up. If it matches whatever I've searched for, it's good.

Most people are probably like that.
User avatar
Irregular.Fox
Site Admin
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:37 am


Return to Site Stuff

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests